|
The following are
excerpts from the BritishV8 Journal


New MGB 4-Link Rear Suspension from Classic Conversions Engineering
The British V8 Newsletter, Volume XV Issue 3, December 2007
by: Curtis Jacobson
Background
What are the weakest links of the original MGB? Many critics would answer the
rear suspension. It's not a question of durability - the main issue is ride
quality. Looking over old MGB magazine reviews (including most of the MGB GT V8
articles we've reprinted in this issue of the Newsletter) you'll notice that
complaints about ride-quality were one of biggest and most persistent gripes
about MGBs in their day. Especially at low speeds, road shock comes right up
through the leaf springs and into the driver's spine. The problem is worse when
an engine transplant is performed. Stock leaf springs are ill-equipped to deal
with increased engine torque. The usual result is noticeable "axle tramp" on
acceleration. As the front sections of the leaf springs wind up and unwind,
they're also subject to premature sagging and/or leaf breakage.
MG was aware of the ride issue long before the first MGB was even built.
According to an interview of MGB designer Don Hayter (which I found in Ken
Smith's excellent little book "Aspects of Abingdon" as published by MG World,
copyright 2006), the very first MGB prototype was fitted with a trailing arm and
coil spring rear suspension that included a Panhard rod for side-to-side axle
location. A similar suspension had been installed on MGA developmental vehicles.
The factory engineers preferred coil spring suspension over leaf springs to
achieve a smoother ride. Ultimately though, MG engineers were unable to overcome
a slight steering effect caused by fitting a too-short Panhard rod. The "ox
cart" leaf spring suspension they ultimately carried over from the MGA was
"cheap and cheerful", but many of us have been tempted to upgrade or replace it.
Please support the sponsoring companies who make British V8 possible,
including:

Beyond ride quality, there may be other good, valid reasons to modify your
MGB rear suspension:
1. It's difficult to finely adjust ride height on a leaf spring
suspension.
2. It's a pain to readjust ride height as the leaf springs sag over time.
3. Easy ride height adjustability makes rubber-to-chrome bumper
conversions easier.
4. Maybe you'd like to tune "corner weight" loading to balance the car
side-to-side?
5. Today's stickier tires let us corner harder, which calls for better
side-to-side axle location.
6. Our taller, wider tires may rub against our fenders unless we improve
side-to-side axle location
7. Leaf springs are heavy. (Insert your favorite Colin Chapman quote
here... Besides, the heavy weight of the
leaf springs and axle forced MG to use uncomfortable shock dampening
characteristics in the first place.)
8. If we have axle tramp, we're losing acceleration potential and we're
risking dangerous leaf spring failure.
9. If we fit low profile tires, we don't get as much shock absorption in
the tire sidewall.
10. With hi-torque engines and overdrive, we need to change axle ratio
and we want a limited slip differential.
The most economical way to get these is usually a narrowed American-made
axle. When we fit that
narrowed Ford, GM, or Dana axle we'll probably need to adjust axle pinion
angle too.
The all new Classic Conversions Engineering "4-link" rear suspension
addresses all these issues quite elegantly, and it even addresses them without a
Panhard rod.
Features of the Classic Conversions 4-link Rear Suspension
The Classic Conversions 4-link rear suspension features coilover shock
absorbers in lieu of heavy leaf springs and the MGB's original Armstrong
knee-action shock absorbers. As soon as your UPS guy delivers the box, you'll
know there's a big weight difference! The suspension's creator, Bill Guzman,
advises us that the Classic Conversions 4-link suspension weighs about 47 pounds
less than a stock MGB rear suspension.
As soon as you see the coilover shocks and their mounting brackets, you'll
understand another of his suspension's biggest selling points. It facilitates
exceptionally easy adjustment and fine-tuning of ride height. Ride height can be
adjusted by placing the shock in either one of two mounting holes on the axle
bracket. The lower position nominally places the car 1" below stock ride height.
Subsequently, ride height can be precision adjusted by rotating the threaded
lower spring perch on the coilover shock absorber's body. According to Bill,
with the spring perch threaded to its lowest position, your car's static ride
height should be two inches below a "chrome-bumper" MGB's factory-original ride
height.

These two photos show the suspension's lowest and highest static height
settings.
Bill also advises that Classic Conversions will introduce a new, matching MGB
front suspension next spring that will be similarly adjustable at the front of
the car. Although most of us are content to just level (and lower) the ride
height and leave it at that, easy adjustability at all four corners will allow
some of us to equalize "corner weights" to get the very most traction out of our
tires (for competitive autocrossing, etc.)
Enjoying this article? Our newsletter is funded through the
generous support of readers like you!
To contribute to our operating budget, please click
here and follow the instructions.
(Suggested contribution is twenty bucks per year. Feel free to give more!)
The Classic Conversions Engineering 4-link rear suspension also facilitates
four wheel alignment. In other words, you or your alignment shop can easily
adjust the suspension to make sure the rear axle is tracking straight. You can
also easily adjust the rear axle's pinion angle, or dial in a little bit of
anti-squat characteristic to the rear suspension.
Want easily adjustable shock absorber valving too? The coilover shock absorbers
that are standard equipment with the kit are made by Carrera, but Alden aluminum
adjustable coilovers are available at an additional cost.

The Classic Conversions 4-link is designed to be simple to install. Only a
minimal amount of welding
is required, and the welds in question (shown here) are of heavy gauge brackets
to the top of the axle
tubes. If you're not comfortable welding, this job wouldn't be very expensive to
farm-out locally.
Easy Installation - Suits a Broad Range of Applications
The Classic Conversions 4-link rear suspension is designed to be installable
in one afternoon. (Whether this is really possible will depend on what's in the
way. You may have to alter your exhaust system, etc.) The design utilizes the
MGB's front leaf spring mounting holes, and the bolt holes for the old
knee-action shocks. Just to set the record straight for purists: this
installation is completely "reversible".
This design should also work equally nicely with all the popular stock and
aftermarket axles: either MGB's "banjo" or Salisbury axles, and with either
lugged or splined hubs, plus also narrowed Ford, GM, or Dana axles.
Designed for serviceability...
Although the system is durable and intended to last for years without
modification, it's also designed to be easily serviceable. Spring changes, for
example, are just a matter of unbolting the bottom bolt of the shock, unscrewing
the spring-perch nut, and replacing the spring.
The coil spring for the GT has a nominal rating of 160 lbs per inch, and the
coil spring for the roadster has a nominal rating of 140 lbs per inch. Both GT
and roadster kits utilize the same shock absorber valving.

Top links are angled inward...
All four of the suspension links are custom made out of gold anodized 6061-T6
aluminum. The links feature 5/8" threaded stainless-steel rod-ends with urethane
bushings, and they have right-hand threads at one end and left-hand threads at
the other for easy adjustability. So long as the rod-ends don't bind up, the
rods can only be loaded along their axis, in tension or compression. The rods
are sufficiently strong to eliminate axle tramp (assuming that the rear axle
itself is rigid).
 
How Does It Function?
Notice in the photos that the top pair of links are angled-in toward the
center of the axle. This design was chosen to make a Panhard rod unnecessary.
Working together, the two links should positively locate the axle from
side-to-side. Of course there will be some side-to-side motion due to compliance
in the rubber bushes, but compared to the original MGB suspension the car should
feel more secure on turns, tire scuffing on the wheel wells or fender-lips
should be avoided, and you may be able to fit wider tires.
Let's digress and review for a moment what a Panhard rod is and how it
functions. A Panhard rod is a single link mounted parallel to the rear axle with
one end mounted to the axle and the other end mounted to the frame or body of
the car, usually for the sole purpose of keeping the axle centered. Panhard rods
can be made to work great, and they're both simple and cost-effective - but they
can also cause problems! Think for a moment of the axle end of the Panhard rod
as being positively fixed in space, with the rest of the rod free to pivot
around it. When the car goes over a bump, the body end of the Panhard rod must
move up and down relative to the axle. Since the rod is rigid and has a fixed
length, the body also gets shoved a little bit side-to-side as the rod-end
swings through an arc. A longer Panhard rod induces less side-to-side motion for
a given amount of up-and-down motion. (Take a ruler and compass to some paper if
you need to prove this to yourself.) Thus, Panhard rods should always be as long
as feasible!
By not using a Panhard rod, the Classic Conversions 4-link has avoided the
induced steering effect on bumps that MG engineers reportedly had with their
coil-sprung rear suspension prototypes.
Another inherent feature of the new Classic Conversions suspension is
"anti-squat". Bill tells us that the suspension links have been deliberately
angled to counteract compressive force at the rear springs as the weight of car
shifts rearward. The result will be added traction and improved acceleration
when exiting corners.
Speaking of cornering, how does the suspension react to body roll in turns? Does
the geometry of the suspension cause the rear axle to cock slightly to one side,
thus causing "roll steer"? When just one rear wheel hits a bump, will the driver
need to make a steering correction due to "bump steer"? If there is indeed a
roll steer effect, how strong is it? Does the effect tend toward "under steer"
or "over steer"?
Bill advises that the Classic Conversions 4-link has a slight roll steer
characteristic which is in the direction of over steer. In other words, as the
body pitches in a turn it will tend to cause the car to steer a tighter line.
Later model MGB axles were equipped with a rear anti-sway bar. It was mounted
just above and parallel-to the axle and its two arms extended forward to mounts
on the body. ( Click here to see what these anti-sway
bars looked like.) If your car is equipped
with this style anti-sway bar, it will need to be removed before the top links
of the suspension can even be installed. The new 4-link rear suspension was
designed to be used without a rear anti-sway bar.
Bill has rigged up a static roll-test and been unable to induce binding in any
suspension pivot through the full travel of the suspension. All of the bolted
joints in the suspension are in double-shear. The suspension is provided with
all the SAE Grade-8 hardware required for installation.
The Classic Conversions four-link rear suspension kit is priced at $1,325.00
plus shipping. Through March 31, Classic Conversions is offering a special
introductory discount price of just $1143, plus shipping. With optional Alden
shocks in the near future.
The upper chassis mount uses the old shock absorber mounting holes.

Stock bump stops and rebound straps can be left unchanged.
(For added safety, when you weld the mounting tabs onto your axle you may want
to weld a simple
reinforcement strap or two between them to reduce the likelihood of fatigue
cracking in the welds.)
The Classic Conversions 4-link provides a full range of suspension travel
without binding.
(The lower end of the shock absorber has been disconnected for this
demonstration photo.)
Disclaimer: This page was written by Curtis Jacobson based on information
provided by Bill Guzman. Views expressed are those of the author, and are
provided without warrantee or guarantee. The author has not tested the
suspension in question. All suspension and chassis modifications are made at the
reader's own risk.
Photos by Bill Guzman. All rights reserved.
|